Skip to main content

Introducing......the RUBY One-Name Study



Welcome to the Ruby surname blog!  We are a small team of Guild of One-Name Studies members who came together to undertake a project to honour the Guild’s 40th anniversary in September 2019.  And what is the Guild, you ask?  For readers who are not members, the Guild is a non-profit society of those who work on or have an interest in one-name studies, or surname studies.  While traditional genealogy/family history works on a person’s own family line, a one-name study takes on the study of one surname (and perhaps its variants).  To learn more about this, and what motivates people to take on what seems a daunting task, visit the Guild’s website at one-name.org.  Be warned: one-name studies are known to be addictive.

Why Ruby?  For those of you who track such things, the ruby gemstone is associated with a 40th anniversary and seemed an appropriate choice.  In looking into the surname, what became apparent was its multinational origins: French, German, Hungarian, Russian, Irish, and more. As the wordle above demonstrates there can be a number of possibilities to connect to Ruby – we hope to find out which ones are true connections.  While many Rubys live in English-speaking countries, one can hypothesize that they may have emigrated and perhaps changed (or had changed for them) the spelling of their surname to an anglicized version.  This is the story of the international aim of the Guild in one surname.  Thus, we have established our first study goal:  to collect Ruby individuals and families and to determine their country origins regardless of sharing the same surname.  

At the moment, we are sticking strictly to the RUBY spelling of the surname.  The many variations of the name that we will encounter along the way will not be ignored, and one or more of them might end up being so integrated with Ruby that we cannot study one without the other.  It is always a good strategy to undertake a one-name study in manageable chunks and restricting to Ruby in the initial stage is our way of doing so. 

A one-name study always begins with collection of people, using Census records or Census substitutes in countries without a Census; birth, marriage and death information(BMDs); and depending on the country or the surname, other data sets that start to create sufficient data to analyse patterns related to your study goals.  The Ruby project team has determined that from the beginning, we aim to construct families as we go.  This is the beauty of Census data as many family groups are put together for you.  It’s a start.

Another feature of the Ruby study is collaboration.   Small and medium size one-name studies can be done by one person.  Many large studies are a result of collaboration. For the Ruby study, we have a timeline of September 2019 to make substantial progress.  We are also working simultaneously on different geographic areas, making use of peoples’ expertise in different countries.  Some standards are being established, while at the same time allowing flexibility for volunteers to have an enjoyable experience.  It’s a new adventure for those who have always worked independently and makes the most of the Guild’s longstanding promotion of collaboration among its members.

Do you want to know what we find out about the Ruby surname? Do you want to learn more about a one-name study?  Are you a new member of the Guild and want to follow the progress of the study from its inception to a more mature study?  Then register to receive blog updates.  At least once a month there will be a new post, and in some cases, more frequently.  Guest bloggers may post about a particular experience as they work on the study.  And of course, we may come across some famous and infamous Rubys with stories you will want to hear! 

Don't forget to register by clicking on Subscribe on the upper right of the screen.  Come follow us on our journey.  

Peggy and the Ruby Team



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PASSING THE TORCH

Thank you to Paul, who took on a project that was untried and became a rather large initiative.  His post below is an excellent summary. It is just a fact that without Paul the bumpy start to this concept would never have achieved what it did.  My own contributions never met their unrealistic goals - oh sure I will cover every Ruby in Canada - and due to many shifting priorities, my commitment regretfully decreased as time progressed but Paul persevered and never gave up the goal - Kudos! Peggy Chapman This is the final note from me as project manager for the initial stage of the Ruby One-Name Study, started by the Guild of One-Name Studies as a means of demonstrating what Guild members could do when working together in a tight timetable to celebrate the Guild’s 40 th birthday in September 2019. We started this project early in 2018 when three of us, me in Florida, Peggy in Canada and Karen in Australia had a few video-conference discussions to figure out how best...
Learnings from the Ruby study   #1 – Impact of the new GRO index One of the first things to do when starting out on a new One-Name Study is to construct some core data sets.   Apart from being a requirement set by the Guild, there are several other reasons why it makes sense to do this. 1.      These lists act as helpful checklists as one reconstructs families 2.      They can also be a useful reminder of the scale of the study in different countries and thus possibly aid in decision-making about where to start 3.      As one notes which individuals from each data set have been included the notes can be used as a means of checking progress and ultimately for answering the question, “How will you know you have finished?” The initial Ruby team constructed core data sets for several countries: notably Canada, England and Wales, France, Ireland, New Zealand, Scotland, and the USA.   The original England ...

Outside your geographical comfort zone? Some tips to help in a one-name study.

In my own one-name study, I have been to different countries both virtually and in person to conduct research.   The effort to date has been primarily in the Channel Islands, pre-confederation Newfoundland, Canada, England, a very little bit of France, and some beginning research in the United States. I am fortunate to have a reasonable degree of fluency in French, which I have used quite a bit in old Jersey documents, although the Jersey dialect itself, known as Jèrrais , is definitely beyond me.   Thank goodness a lot of old documents followed the Norman tradition of “standard” French.   The Ruby project presents quite an interesting experience for those who have not strayed far from home in their one-name study research.   It is unlikely that any version of Ruby has its origins in the United Kingdom, despite a longstanding presence in southwestern England and in parts of Ireland.   Preliminary reading suggests that for both these areas, th...