Skip to main content

The confusion of war




Sheila Dohoo Faure,  a Canadian Guild member, is one of the researchers delving into the many French Rubys.  Indeed, when the original data on Rubys worldwide was gathered, France was one of the primary sources of the origin of the Ruby surname.  Here, Sheila shares the story of Maurice Ruby and the mixups of wartime. 



Maurice Marie Joseph Ruby was born on 5 November 1888 in Lyon, France, the son of Benoit Joseph Amedée Ruby and Augustine Marthe Lacroix. His parents had married in Lyon on 24 November 1887 and had two children—Maurice had a younger brother, Henri Marie Cyprien, born in 1890. His father worked in the silk industry which, at the time, was a pillar of Lyon’s economy. His grandfather, Alexandre Annet Ruby, and great-grandfather before him had been shopkeepers in Lyon.

Maurice may have been the first in his family to get a higher education. He attended the Ecole des Mines in St Etienne—just 60 kilometres away from Lyon—and graduated in 1913. Just over a year later, war broke out in Europe. When war was declared, Maurice was probably working as a mining engineer at the Compagnie des Mines in Béthune, in northern France.

Maurice was first a second lieutenant and then captain, serving in the 297th Infantry Regiment. He was seriously wounded on 29 January 1915 and received treatment for a year for the head wound he had sustained. But he returned to service, only to die a few months later either in the Battle of Verdun or the Battle of the Somme.

At the beginning of June 1916, the 297th Regiment was stationed around Vézelise and Haroué, about 200 kilometres southeast of Nancy, France. Then by mid-June it had moved north towards Verdun and Thiaumont, about 125 kilometres east of Reims

The location and timing of Maurice’s death are somewhat confusing. His military record indicates that he died on 22 June in Chevrengy, Aisne. Chevrengy is about 160 kilometres west of Thiaumont. Memorials at the Ecole des Mines in St Etienne and at the Compagnie des Mines in Béthune suggest that he died at Pargny-Filain, which is very close to Épine de Chevregny. Indeed, another record suggests he died on the Chemin des Dames, near Pargny-Filain. However, war diaries for his regiment do not indicate the death of a Ruby on 22 June—rather they show a Lieutenant Ruby as being injured on 24 June, when the regiment would have been nearer to Thiaumont.

No doubt record-keeping was challenging on the Front. However, wherever Maurice died, the accounts of his death reflected very positively on his service. 0ne account of his death states that “[h]is company received the order to attack and he came out of the tunnels to inspect the ground before him. He received a shrapnel wound to the forehead while accomplishing his reconnaissance.” [translation] He was described as “[i]n all aspects an excellent officer” and a “brave, calm officer carrying out his duty.” [translation] He was awarded the Croix de Guerre and the Légion d’Honneur.
                                                                                                                                                         
Just before the war, he had married Jacqueline Marguerite Marie Fonteix. They married in Lyon on 8 July 1914 and had their first child, a son, in 1916. He possibly never knew his father.


Sources:

Archives départementales et métropolitaines : Rhône http://archives.rhone.fr/
MemorialGenWeb:  www.memorialgenweb.org/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PASSING THE TORCH

Thank you to Paul, who took on a project that was untried and became a rather large initiative.  His post below is an excellent summary. It is just a fact that without Paul the bumpy start to this concept would never have achieved what it did.  My own contributions never met their unrealistic goals - oh sure I will cover every Ruby in Canada - and due to many shifting priorities, my commitment regretfully decreased as time progressed but Paul persevered and never gave up the goal - Kudos! Peggy Chapman This is the final note from me as project manager for the initial stage of the Ruby One-Name Study, started by the Guild of One-Name Studies as a means of demonstrating what Guild members could do when working together in a tight timetable to celebrate the Guild’s 40 th birthday in September 2019. We started this project early in 2018 when three of us, me in Florida, Peggy in Canada and Karen in Australia had a few video-conference discussions to figure out how best to take

DRY Genealogy and a word from the new Ruby team

For readers who are not Guild members, the Ruby project will be transferring to "real" Rubys the end of September.  Michael Ruby has introduced himself and provided a very interesting read on DRY approach to genealogy.  I think many of us can relate to the amusing but true definiton of WET!  And with Michael's permission, I would love to adopt the sentence " Genealogy as a whole is forever beautifully unfinished."   Peggy Homans Chapman Hello, everyone. My name is Michael Ruby. I am part of the team that will be inheriting the Ruby One-Name Study on 30 September. I would like to take this opportunity to express gratitude, to introduce myself, and to offer some initial thoughts about the future of the study by way of this blog post’s main body. In it, I wish to offer something that I hope is at least a little bit fresh: a computer science-style argument for the value of approaching genealogy through the one-name study.   I have a feeling that most geneal
In today's post, Paul Howes describes how the Ruby study has taken on a contemporary approach by looking at UK files that reflect a primarily English one-name study of a different era.  Aside from electronic vs paper, a primary focus in today's one-name study is family reconstruction from the beginning.  A different dynamic Thanks to another member of the Guild of One-Name Studies, we recently became aware of some considerable work done on a large number of Ruby families by a man named Reed, now deceased.  The member had prepared a large number of electronic files for transfer to the Society of Genealogists (SoG)* together with ten boxes of paper files.  The SoG now owns this material but has kindly given us access to Mr Reed's work in advance of its being fully accessioned and we acknowledge with thanks their kind contribution to our effort. Mr Reed was not a Guild member but as I viewed the paper copy of his material at the SoG it was clear that he had gone about